Toyota Highlander 2013 vs Mazda CX-9 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 HP | 277 HP | |
| Torque: | 337 NM | 367 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Highlander is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Highlander engine produces 3 HP more power than Mazda CX-9, but torque is 30 NM less than Mazda CX-9. Thanks to more power Toyota Highlander reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 11.3 | |
|
The Toyota Highlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Highlander consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that by driving the Toyota Highlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 197 mm (7.8 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Highlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Toyota Highlander is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Highlander is 23 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 391 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2370 litres | 2852 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Mazda CX-9 has more luggage space (by 96 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 482 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 5.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`844 | 2`712 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Highlander has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |