Toyota Highlander 2016 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 356 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Highlander engine produces 91 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 94 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Toyota Highlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 10.7 | |
|
The Toyota Highlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Highlander consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Toyota Highlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 86 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Lexus RX, Lexus IS, Lexus GS, Toyota Tacoma | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Highlander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Toyota Highlander is smaller. Toyota Highlander is 11 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Highlander is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 269 litres | 639 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
813 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage space. Toyota Highlander has 370 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`760 | 3`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 112 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Highlander has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |