Toyota Highlander 2013 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 337 NM | 329 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota Highlander is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Highlander engine produces 1 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 8 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Toyota Highlander reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 13.5 | |
|
The Toyota Highlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Highlander consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Toyota Highlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.87 m | |
| Toyota Highlander is 4 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Highlander is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 663 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 391 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 663 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2370 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 5.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`755 | 2`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Highlander has
|
| |