Toyota Highlander 2013 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 337 NM | 347 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Highlander engine produces 37 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Toyota Highlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 10.4 | |
| Toyota Highlander consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Highlander could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 197 mm (7.8 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Lexus RX, Toyota Camry, Toyota Sienna, Lexus ES | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Toyota Highlander is 4 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Highlander is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 391 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2370 litres | 1554 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Highlander (by 816 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 5.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Highlander is 5.7 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Toyota Highlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`755 | 2`812 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 25 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Highlander has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |