Toyota Highlander 2013 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Toyota Highlander) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 248 HP | |
| Torque: | 337 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Highlander engine produces 1 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, but torque is 263 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Despite the higher power, Toyota Highlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 7.3 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Highlander consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Highlander could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 77 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Lexus RX, Toyota Camry, Toyota Sienna, Lexus ES | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Highlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Toyota Highlander is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Highlander is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 784 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 391 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 784 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2370 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 5.9 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Highlander is 6.7 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means Toyota Highlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`755 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 37 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Highlander has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |