Toyota Highlander 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 188 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 252 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Highlander is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Highlander engine produces 2 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 32 NM more than Honda CR-V. Despite less power, Toyota Highlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 8.4 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Highlander consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Highlander could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Lexus RX | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Highlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Highlander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Toyota Highlander is larger. Toyota Highlander is 32 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 11 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Highlander is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 391 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2370 litres | 1669 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Highlander (by 701 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 5.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Highlander is 5.9 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Toyota Highlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`625 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Highlander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |