Toyota Highlander 2013 vs BMW X5 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 188 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 252 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Highlander engine produces 118 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 148 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Toyota Highlander reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 10.1 | |
| Toyota Highlander consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that by driving the Toyota Highlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 197 mm (7.8 inches) | 222 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Lexus RX | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW X5 2010 3.0 engine: Using poor quality oil on this engine will quickly lead to soot build-up, resulting in damage to the hydrocompensators, Vanos and Valvetronic systems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Toyota Highlander and BMW X5 are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 391 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2370 litres | 1750 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Highlander (by 620 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 5.9 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Highlander is 6.9 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Toyota Highlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`625 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Highlander has
|
BMW X5 has
| |