Toyota Highlander 2007 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 HP | 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 337 NM | 291 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Highlander engine produces 43 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 46 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 10.4 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Highlander consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Highlander could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 206 mm (8.1 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Lexus RX, Toyota Camry, Toyota Sienna, Lexus ES | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Highlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Toyota Highlander is larger. Toyota Highlander is 12 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 11 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Highlander is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 292 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2282 litres | 1691 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Highlander (by 591 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`720 | 2`335 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Highlander has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |