Toyota Highlander 2016 vs Ford Explorer 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Toyota Highlander is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Explorer can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota Highlander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 2.7 - 3.5 | 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 188 - 296 HP | 249 - 345 HP | |
Torque: | 252 - 358 NM | 346 - 475 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 6.4 - 8.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 10.7 | 11.0 - 12.3 | |
Toyota Highlander petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Explorer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.89 m | 5.02 m | |
Width: | 1.93 m | 1.99 m | |
Height: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
Toyota Highlander is smaller. Toyota Highlander is 13 cm shorter than the Ford Explorer, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Highlander is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 269 litres | 595 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
813 litres | no data | |
Ford Explorer has more luggage space. Toyota Highlander has 326 litres less trunk space than the Ford Explorer. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`677 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 15 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Highlander has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |