Toyota Highlander 2013 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Toyota Highlander is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Pajero can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota Highlander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 2.7 - 3.5 | 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 188 - 280 HP | 250 HP | |
Torque: | 252 - 337 NM | 329 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 10.3 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 10.6 | 13.5 | |
Toyota Highlander petrol engines consumes on average 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | 4.90 m | |
Width: | 1.93 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.87 m | |
Toyota Highlander is 4 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Highlander is 14 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 663 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2370 litres | no data | |
Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage space. Toyota Highlander has 272 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Turning diameter: | 5.9 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`741 | ~ 2`910 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 21 400 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Highlander has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |