Toyota Highlander 2013 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2011

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Toyota Highlander
2013 - 2016
Mitsubishi Pajero
2011 - 2014
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Toyota Highlander is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Pajero can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota Highlander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.7 - 3.53.8

Performance

Power: 188 - 280 HP250 HP
Torque: 252 - 337 NM329 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 - 10.3 seconds10.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.4 - 10.613.5
Toyota Highlander petrol engines consumes on average 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.90 m
Width: 1.93 m1.88 m
Height: 1.73 m1.87 m
Toyota Highlander is 4 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Highlander is 14 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 391 litres663 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2370 litresno data
Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage space.
Toyota Highlander has 272 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero.
Turning diameter: 5.9 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`741~ 2`910
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 21 800no data
Pros and Cons: Toyota Highlander has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
Mitsubishi Pajero has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv