Toyota Highlander 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota Highlander is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Honda CR-V has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 3.5 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Honda CR-V is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 188 - 280 HP | 120 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 252 - 337 NM | 190 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 10.3 seconds | 9.7 - 12.8 seconds | |
| In general, Toyota Highlander are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Honda CR-V. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 10.6 | 4.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Toyota Highlander petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Toyota Highlander is larger. Toyota Highlander is 31 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 11 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Highlander is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2370 litres | 1669 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Toyota Highlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Highlander (by 701 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 5.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Highlander is 5.9 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Toyota Highlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`741 kg | ~ 2`133 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`030 kg | ~ 1`581 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 711 kg | ~ 552 kg | |
| Toyota Highlander load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem more than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Toyota Highlander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Highlander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |