Toyota Highlander 2013 vs Mazda CX-9 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 3.5 | 3.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 188 - 280 HP | 273 - 277 HP | |
| Torque: | 252 - 337 NM | 367 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 10.3 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 10.6 | 11.3 | |
|
Toyota Highlander petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-9. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 197 mm (7.8 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Toyota Highlander is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Highlander is 23 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2370 litres | 2852 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-9 has more luggage space. Toyota Highlander has 96 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-9. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 482 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 5.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`741 | ~ 2`712 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Highlander has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |