Toyota Highlander 2007 vs Honda CR-V 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota Highlander is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Honda CR-V has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 3.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Honda CR-V is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 187 - 273 HP | 140 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 - 337 NM | 192 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 9.8 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| In general, Toyota Highlander are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Honda CR-V. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 12.4 | 6.5 - 9.5 | |
|
Toyota Highlander petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 206 mm (8.1 inches) | 175 - 185 mm (6.9 - 7.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Highlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Toyota Highlander is larger. Toyota Highlander is 27 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 9 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Highlander is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2282 litres | 1532 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Toyota Highlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Highlander (by 750 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`626 kg | ~ 2`098 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`886 kg | ~ 1`556 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 740 kg | ~ 542 kg | |
| Toyota Highlander load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem more than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Toyota Highlander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Highlander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |