Toyota Highlander 2007 vs Lexus RX 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 3.5 (petrol) | 3.0 - 3.5 (petrol, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 187 - 273 HP | 204 - 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 - 337 NM | 242 - 342 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 9.8 seconds | 7.6 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 12.4 | 8.1 - 12.2 | |
|
Toyota Highlander petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Lexus RX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Toyota Highlander is larger. Toyota Highlander is 5 cm longer than the Lexus RX, 7 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Highlander is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 490 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2282 litres | 2130 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Toyota Highlander has 198 litres less trunk space than the Lexus RX. This could mean that the Toyota Highlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Highlander (by 152 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`626 | ~ 2`422 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Highlander has
|
Lexus RX has
| |