Toyota Hiace 1989 vs Volkswagen Caravelle 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Hiace engine produces 10 HP less power than Volkswagen Caravelle, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Volkswagen Caravelle. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Caravelle) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Toyota Hiace) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.94 m | |
|
Toyota Hiace is smaller. Toyota Hiace is 10 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Caravelle, 15 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 540 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle has
| |