Toyota Hiace 1993 vs Toyota Picnic 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 331 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
| Toyota Hiace engine produces 40 HP more power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 126 NM more than Toyota Picnic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Picnic) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Toyota Hiace) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.95 m | 1.62 m | |
| Toyota Hiace is 16 cm longer than the Toyota Picnic, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Hiace is 33 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Hiace has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |