Toyota Hiace 1993 vs Seat Alhambra 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 331 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 19.3 seconds | |
| Toyota Hiace engine produces 40 HP more power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 129 NM more than Seat Alhambra. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Alhambra) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Toyota Hiace) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.95 m | 1.73 m | |
| Toyota Hiace is 7 cm longer than the Seat Alhambra, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Hiace is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Hiace has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |