Toyota Hiace 1989 vs Toyota Picnic 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Toyota Hiace engine produces 5 HP more power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Toyota Picnic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Picnic) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Toyota Hiace) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 17 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.98 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Toyota Hiace is smaller, but higher. Toyota Hiace is 10 cm shorter than the Toyota Picnic, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Hiace is 36 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |