Toyota Hiace 1989 vs Mazda MPV 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 277 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
| Toyota Hiace engine produces 15 HP less power than Mazda MPV, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Mazda MPV. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 74 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 11 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Hiace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Toyota Hiace is smaller, but higher. Toyota Hiace is 24 cm shorter than the Mazda MPV, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Hiace is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 282 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 282 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1060 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`370 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Hiace has
|
Mazda MPV has
| |