Toyota Hiace 2004 vs Chrysler Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Hiace engine produces 40 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Voyager) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Toyota Hiace) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.98 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Toyota Hiace is smaller, but higher. Toyota Hiace is 12 cm shorter than the Chrysler Voyager, 31 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Hiace is 23 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |