Toyota Hiace 2004 vs Nissan Serena 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Hiace engine produces 20 HP less power than Nissan Serena, but torque is 73 NM more than Nissan Serena. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Nissan Serena) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Toyota Hiace) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.98 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Toyota Hiace is smaller, but higher. Toyota Hiace is 8 cm shorter than the Nissan Serena, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Hiace is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 521 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Serena has
| |