Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Toyota Corolla Verso) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi Space Runner) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Corolla Verso engine produces 46 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, but torque is 37 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Due to the lower power, Toyota Corolla Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 9.2 | |
|
The Toyota Corolla Verso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that by driving the Toyota Corolla Verso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Corolla Verso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Runner engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 45 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Runner engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Corolla Verso is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 417 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1800 litres | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso has 13 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Runner. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla Verso is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Toyota Corolla Verso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla Verso has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |