Toyota Corolla Verso 2001 vs Mazda Premacy 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda Premacy is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Corolla Verso engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda Premacy, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Mazda Premacy. Due to the lower power, Toyota Corolla Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
| By specification Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy, which means that by driving the Toyota Corolla Verso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Premacy engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda 323 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Corolla Verso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Corolla Verso 2001 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Corolla Verso 2001 2.0 engine Mazda Premacy 2001 2.0 engine: The engine is reliable if you use quality diesel. Turbine life is not very long, however. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.60 m | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso is 10 cm shorter than the Mazda Premacy, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Corolla Verso is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 417 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 417 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1760 litres | 1848 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Premacy (by 88 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla Verso is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda Premacy, which means Toyota Corolla Verso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 1`845 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda Premacy has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla Verso, so Toyota Corolla Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla Verso has
|
Mazda Premacy has
| |