Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 vs Renault Scenic 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Corolla Verso engine produces 15 HP less power than Renault Scenic, but torque is 15 NM more than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Toyota Corolla Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Corolla Verso could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Scenic engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4 | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 2.0 engine Renault Scenic 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Renault Scenic 2001 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.68 m | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso is 7 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Corolla Verso is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 417 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla Verso is 0.7 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic, which means Toyota Corolla Verso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 6.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla Verso has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |