Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Corolla Verso engine produces 12 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Star, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Toyota Corolla Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Corolla Verso could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Star engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4 | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 2.0 engine Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.52 m | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso is 19 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Corolla Verso is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 417 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1370 litres | |
|
Toyota Corolla Verso has more luggage capacity. Toyota Corolla Verso has 47 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla Verso is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Toyota Corolla Verso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla Verso has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |