Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 vs Ford C-Max 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Corolla Verso engine produces 19 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Toyota Corolla Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Corolla Verso could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 310'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4 | Used also on Ford Focus | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Corolla Verso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Ford C-Max engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Toyota Corolla Verso is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Corolla Verso is 9 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Corolla Verso is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 417 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla Verso is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Toyota Corolla Verso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford C-Max has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla Verso, so Toyota Corolla Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla Verso has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |