Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla Verso is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Corolla Verso and Citroen Xsara Picasso have the same engine power, but Toyota Corolla Verso torque is 10 NM more than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Toyota Corolla Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Xsara Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Corolla Verso could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Xsara Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 206, Citroen C5, Peugeot 306 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen Xsara Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Toyota Corolla Verso is smaller. Toyota Corolla Verso is 4 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Corolla Verso is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 417 litres | 550 litres | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage space. Toyota Corolla Verso has 133 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla Verso is 1.5 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Toyota Corolla Verso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 6.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla Verso has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |