Toyota Corolla Verso 2001 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Corolla Verso engine produces 45 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Toyota Corolla Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Corolla Verso could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Toyota Corolla Verso 2001 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Corolla Verso 2001 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.50 m | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso and Skoda Fabia are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 417 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 417 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1760 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`035 | 1`713 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Corolla Verso has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla Verso has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |