Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso engine produces 26 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Runner. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 9.2 | |
|
The Toyota Corolla Verso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that by driving the Toyota Corolla Verso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Corolla Verso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Runner engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 44 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Runner engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Corolla Verso is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 417 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1800 litres | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso has 13 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Runner. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla Verso is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Toyota Corolla Verso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`695 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla Verso has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |