Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla Verso is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Corolla Verso engine produces 28 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Star. Thanks to more power Toyota Corolla Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Corolla Verso could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Carisma, Mitsubishi Colt | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.52 m | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso is 19 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Corolla Verso is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 417 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla Verso is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Toyota Corolla Verso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`695 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla Verso has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |