Toyota Corolla Verso 2005 vs Mazda Premacy 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla Verso is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Corolla Verso engine produces 77 HP more power than Mazda Premacy, whereas torque is 170 NM more than Mazda Premacy. Thanks to more power Toyota Corolla Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda Premacy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Corolla Verso could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda Premacy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota RAV4, Lexus IS | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda 323 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Corolla Verso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Corolla Verso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda Premacy 2001 2.0 engine: The engine is reliable if you use quality diesel. Turbine life is not very long, however. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Toyota Corolla Verso is larger. Toyota Corolla Verso is 2 cm longer than the Mazda Premacy, 7 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Corolla Verso is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 423 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1848 litres | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso has 3 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla Verso is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mazda Premacy, which means Toyota Corolla Verso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`165 | 1`845 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda Premacy has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla Verso, so Toyota Corolla Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla Verso has
|
Mazda Premacy has
| |