Toyota Corolla Verso 2005 vs Ford C-Max 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla Verso is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Corolla Verso engine produces 68 HP more power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 160 NM more than Ford C-Max. Thanks to more power Toyota Corolla Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Corolla Verso could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 310'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota RAV4, Lexus IS | Used also on Ford Focus | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Corolla Verso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.60 m | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso is 3 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Corolla Verso is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 423 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla Verso is 1.3 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Toyota Corolla Verso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`165 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford C-Max has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla Verso, so Toyota Corolla Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla Verso has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |