Toyota Corolla Verso 2004 vs Ford C-Max 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso engine produces 26 HP more power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Ford C-Max. Thanks to more power Toyota Corolla Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Corolla Verso could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Corolla Verso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Ford C-Max engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Corolla Verso 2004 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Corolla Verso 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.60 m | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso is 3 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Corolla Verso is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 423 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Corolla Verso has 127 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. This could mean that the Toyota Corolla Verso uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla Verso is 1.3 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Toyota Corolla Verso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Corolla Verso has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 4.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla Verso has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |