Toyota Corolla Verso 2004 vs Ford C-Max 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Corolla Verso engine produces 15 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Toyota Corolla Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Corolla Verso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that by driving the Toyota Corolla Verso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Corolla Verso consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Corolla Verso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 470'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford C-Max engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Corolla Verso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Corolla Verso 2004 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Corolla Verso 2004 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 2.02 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Toyota Corolla Verso is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Corolla Verso is 1 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 25 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Corolla Verso is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 423 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Toyota Corolla Verso has 127 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla Verso is 1.3 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Toyota Corolla Verso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`035 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford C-Max has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla Verso, so Toyota Corolla Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla Verso has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |