Toyota Celica 1991 vs Subaru Impreza 2000
| Body: | Cabrio | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 31 HP more power than Subaru Impreza, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Subaru Impreza. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 9.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Celica consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Impreza, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Celica consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Impreza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Carina E | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Legacy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.44 m | |
| Toyota Celica is 9 cm longer than the Subaru Impreza, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.6 metres more than that of the Subaru Impreza, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Subaru Impreza has
| |