Toyota Celica 1991 vs Hyundai Coupe 1996
| Body: | Cabrio | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 139 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
| Toyota Celica engine produces 17 HP more power than Hyundai Coupe, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Hyundai Coupe. Despite the higher power, Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Coupe is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Coupe, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Celica consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Coupe. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Carina E | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Lantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Coupe engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.31 m | |
| Toyota Celica is 15 cm longer than the Hyundai Coupe, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 362 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Hyundai Coupe has
| |
