Toyota Celica 1995 vs Volvo C70 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 12 HP more power than Volvo C70, but torque is 44 NM less than Volvo C70. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.7 | |
| Toyota Celica consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo C70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.33 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is smaller. Toyota Celica is 22 cm shorter than the Volvo C70, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 262 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Volvo C70 has
| |