Toyota Celica 1995 vs Toyota Celica 2002
| Body: | Cabrio | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
| Toyota Celica 1995 engine produces 32 HP more power than Toyota Celica 2002, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Toyota Celica 2002. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica 1995 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 7.7 | |
|
The Toyota Celica 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Celica 1995 consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica 2002, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica 1995 could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Celica 2002 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Carina E | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota Celica 2002 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 2002 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.33 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Toyota Celica 1995 is larger. Toyota Celica 1995 is 15 cm longer than the Toyota Celica 2002, 1 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica 1995 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica 1995 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica 2002, which means Toyota Celica 1995 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |