Toyota Celica 1995 vs Chrysler Stratus 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 44 HP more power than Chrysler Stratus, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Chrysler Stratus. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.3 | |
|
The Chrysler Stratus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Celica consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Stratus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| Chrysler Stratus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Carina E | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Neon, Dodge Neon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chrysler Stratus engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.33 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is smaller. Toyota Celica is 40 cm shorter than the Chrysler Stratus, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1.2 metres less than that of the Chrysler Stratus, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Chrysler Stratus has
| |