Toyota Celica 1990 vs Volkswagen Scirocco 1982
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 44 HP more power than Volkswagen Scirocco, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Volkswagen Scirocco. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.0 | |
| Toyota Celica consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Scirocco, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.28 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is larger. Toyota Celica is 37 cm longer than the Volkswagen Scirocco, 6 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1195 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Scirocco, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`200 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Volkswagen Scirocco has
| |