Toyota Celica 1990 vs Mazda MX-6 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 40 HP more power than Mazda MX-6, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Mazda MX-6. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda MX-6 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-6, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Celica consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Carina E | Used also on Mazda 626 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda MX-6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is smaller. Toyota Celica is 20 cm shorter than the Mazda MX-6, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 404 litres | |
|
Mazda MX-6 has more luggage space. Toyota Celica has 84 litres less trunk space than the Mazda MX-6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Mazda MX-6 has
| |