Toyota Celica 1990 vs Honda Prelude 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 179 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 23 HP more power than Honda Prelude, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Honda Prelude. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Prelude is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Celica consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Carina E | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.29 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Celica is 2 cm shorter than the Honda Prelude, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Honda Prelude has
| |