Toyota Celica 1990 vs Honda Civic 1996
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Honda Civic is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Celica engine produces 4 HP less power than Honda Civic, but torque is 33 NM more than Honda Civic. Due to the lower power, Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Civic is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Celica consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 530 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Carina E | Used also on Honda CRX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.39 m | |
| Toyota Celica is 4 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Celica is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 335 litres | |
| Toyota Celica has 15 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1 metres more than that of the Honda Civic, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Honda Civic has
| |