Toyota Celica 1990 vs Audi Coupe 1989
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 156 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 186 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 20 HP more power than Audi Coupe, but torque is 4 NM less than Audi Coupe. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
By specification Toyota Celica consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Coupe, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Celica consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Coupe. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
600 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.42 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.37 m | |
Toyota Celica is 5 cm longer than the Audi Coupe, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 296 litres | |
Toyota Celica has more luggage capacity. Toyota Celica has 24 litres more trunk space than the Audi Coupe. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.1 metres less than that of the Audi Coupe. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`630 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3400 | 4000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
| |