Toyota Celica 1990 vs Audi Coupe 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 40 HP more power than Audi Coupe, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Audi Coupe. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Coupe is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Coupe, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Celica consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Coupe. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Coupe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.38 m | |
| Toyota Celica is 5 cm longer than the Audi Coupe, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 296 litres | |
|
Toyota Celica has more luggage capacity. Toyota Celica has 24 litres more trunk space than the Audi Coupe. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Audi Coupe has
| |