Toyota Celica 1990 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Celica engine produces 11 HP more power than Mitsubishi Eclipse, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Carina E | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.31 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Celica is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 289 litres | |
|
Toyota Celica has more luggage capacity. Toyota Celica has 31 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Eclipse. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Eclipse, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
| |