Toyota Celica 1990 vs Ford Probe 1993
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 118 HP | |
Torque: | 142 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
Ford Probe is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Celica engine produces 13 HP less power than Ford Probe, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Ford Probe. Due to the lower power, Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Probe, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Probe. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
740 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.42 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.31 m | |
Toyota Celica is smaller. Toyota Celica is 16 cm shorter than the Ford Probe, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1 metres less than that of the Ford Probe, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3400 | 3800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Ford Probe has
| |