Toyota Celica 1990 vs Ford Probe 1993

 
Toyota Celica
1990 - 1994
Ford Probe
1993 - 1997
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 105 HP118 HP
Torque: 142 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds10.6 seconds
Ford Probe is a more dynamic driving.
Toyota Celica engine produces 13 HP less power than Ford Probe, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Ford Probe. Due to the lower power, Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.17.8
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km8.5 l/100km
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Toyota Celica consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Probe, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Probe.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres59 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 840 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
740 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.58 m
Width: 1.70 m1.78 m
Height: 1.30 m1.31 m
Toyota Celica is smaller.
Toyota Celica is 16 cm shorter than the Ford Probe, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 320 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1 metres less than that of the Ford Probe, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 78003800
Pros and Cons: Toyota Celica has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Ford Probe has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv