Toyota Celica 1990 vs Honda Prelude 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 179 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Honda Prelude is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Celica engine produces 28 HP less power than Honda Prelude, whereas torque is 37 NM less than Honda Prelude. Due to the lower power, Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Carina E | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.29 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Celica is 2 cm shorter than the Honda Prelude, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda Prelude, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Honda Prelude has
| |