Toyota Celica 1995 vs Mazda MX-3 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 242 HP | 132 HP | |
| Torque: | 302 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 110 HP more power than Mazda MX-3, whereas torque is 142 NM more than Mazda MX-3. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 7 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda MX-3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is larger, but slightly lower. Toyota Celica is 20 cm longer than the Mazda MX-3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 208 litres | 289 litres | |
|
Mazda MX-3 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Celica has 81 litres less trunk space than the Mazda MX-3. This could mean that the Toyota Celica uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-3, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`785 | 1`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Mazda MX-3 has
| |