Toyota Celica 1995 vs Honda CRX 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 242 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 302 NM | 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 117 HP more power than Honda CRX, whereas torque is 160 NM more than Honda CRX. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 7.5 | |
|
The Honda CRX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Celica consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CRX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.26 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is larger. Toyota Celica is 42 cm longer than the Honda CRX, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 208 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 2 metres more than that of the Honda CRX, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`785 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Honda CRX has
| |